Scientists challenge fundamental precepts of virology. Do viruses even exist?
The article below questions the existence of the COVID-19 virus and challenges virology as a science, citing various experts and investigations:
1. Neil Oliver’s Doubt: Scottish presenter Neil Oliver claims there was no COVID-19 virus, citing hospital statistics and labeling the pandemic as propaganda.
2. Christine Massey’s Research: Massey issued Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to 216 institutions worldwide, seeking evidence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. None provided proof of the virus’s isolation.
3. Dr. Mark Bailey’s Thesis: Bailey’s extended thesis argues virology is pseudoscience, failing to prove the existence of viruses by not isolating viral particles directly from human tissues or fluids.
4. Virology Methods Criticized: Virologists allegedly use cell culture and genome sequencing instead of direct isolation, deemed unscientific by critics.
5. Existing Virus Debate: Health freedom physicians such as Drs. Michael Palmer and Sucharit Bhakdi defend long-held beliefs in viruses’ existence, while skeptics call for proper scientific isolation procedures.
6. Electron Microscopy and Peer-Reviewed Papers: Critics argue that visible particles under electron microscopy have not been proven to be viruses and that quantity of peer-reviewed papers is insufficient without unequivocal evidence.
7. Impact on Medical Industry: If proven viruses do not exist, this could collapse significant parts of the medical industry, including vaccination schedules.
The article concludes by urging U.S. citizens to demand Congress investigate excess death rates and support investigative journalism through donations.
