What is the Probability?

/1 Comment

Let’s consider an oversimplified scenario.

The estimated number of domain name registrations across all top-level domains is approximately 367.3 million.

Assuming there are 5,939 domains associated with the same IP address, the probability that any given domain is assigned to that particular IP address is correctly calculated as 5,939 divided by 370,000,000, which equals approximately 0.000016.

If there are three individuals known to each other, and each individual has one website within that set of domains, the probability that all three websites randomly end up on the same IP address is obtained by raising the individual domain probability to the power of 3.

The resulting probability of approximately 4.096e-15, or roughly 1 in 244,140,625,000,000, indicates that the likelihood of all three websites ending up on the same IP address purely by chance is extremely low. This probability can be compared to winning the lottery multiple times to illustrate its rarity.

 

From COINTEL 2.0

Math Verified by GregWyatt.net

Del Bigtree & his $600,000 a year grift

/0 Comments

Del Bigtree is paid over six figures for his legislative work. How effective and successful has he been since his organization’s inception in 2016?

What has he accomplished while working with Mark Blaxill and Jen Larson?

Protests?

Creating activists Denise Aguilar, Jonathan Lockwood, Erin Olszewski, and Kevin Tuttle?

Creating orgs that host his speaking tours supported by Scientology and Nation of Islam?

The more you know…

Source: https://t.me/co_appleseed

Are Del Matthew Bigtree and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and their non-profits and charities committing non-profit and charity fraud? Some think so.

Jenn Sherry Parry – Just Another Name in the Story…

/0 Comments

Here’s a video I made from some past research. Very interesting to see the names that come up.

In 2019, ICAN Received $2.46 Million from the “Charitable Foundation” of Global Investment Firm T. Rowe Price.

/0 Comments

Classic money laundering.

Among the top 10 holdings in their Health Services Fund, we find Thermo Fisher Scientific (who makes fraudulent sequencing machines) and AstraZaneca.

By looking at their financials (https://individual.troweprice.com/staticFiles/gcFiles/pdf/phhsfq4.pdf) we can see that T. Rowe Price is also heavily invested in many pharmaceutical and biotech companies including Merck, BioNTech, Amgen, and many others.

So, let’s ask a reasonable question. Why would a giant Global investment firm that is heavily invested in huge pharmaceutical companies, donate $2.46 million dollars to fund an anti-vaccine group?

Bigtree lovers will say that the donations that T. Rowe Price gave to ICAN were given by their donor advised charitable fund. Yes, that’s true. The amounts were $2.5 million in 2019 and $900,000 in 2018. Of course they have to disguise their money laundering via charity fraud. I doubt there’s a way to trace the paper trail back to each individual donor.

But let’s just ask a simple question.

Why would an investment fund donate that much money to a so-called anti-vax non-profit?

Are they expecting a return on their investment? If this is all truly a matter of altruistic and humanitarian giving to the community, then why would they choose an “anti-vax” group? Are we to believe that all these individual donors are crazy anti-vaxxers? To me, it just sounds like classic money laundering.

phhsfq4_(2)-Copy

View PDF in a separate browser tab: https://gregwyatt.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/phhsfq4_2-Copy.pdf

Investments in ICAN

/1 Comment

In 2019, ICAN received $2.46 million from the “charitable foundation” of global investment firm T. Rowe Price.

Among the top 10 holdings in their Health Services Fund, we find Thermo Fisher Scientific (who makes fraudulent sequencing machines) and AstraZaneca. By looking at their financials (https://individual.troweprice.com/staticFiles/gcFiles/pdf/phhsfq4.pdf) we can see that T. Rowe Price is also heavily invested in many pharmaceutical and biotech companies including Merck, BioNTech, Amgen, and many others.

So, let’s ask a reasonable question. Why would a giant Global investment firm that is heavily invested in huge pharmaceutical companies, donate $2.46 million dollars to fund an anti-vaccine group?

Bigtree lovers will say that the donations that T. Rowe Price gave to ICAN were given by their donor advised charitable fund. Yes, that’s true. The amounts were $2.5 million in 2019 and $900,000 in 2018. Of course they have to disguise their money laundering via charity fraud. I doubt there’s a way to trace the paper trail back to each individual donor.

But let’s just ask a simple question. Why would an investment fund donate that much money to a so-called anti-vax non-profit? Are they expecting a return on their investment? If this is all truly a matter of altruistic and humanitarian giving to the community, then why would they choose an “anti-vax” group? Are we to believe that all these individual donors are crazy anti-vaxxers? To me, it just sounds like classic money laundering.

phhsfq4

View PDF in browser:  https://gregwyatt.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/phhsfq4.pdf

 

Copyright © 2023 by Greg Wyatt