“Monetizing Misery”: A Peek Inside My New Book
Check out the entire table of contents of my new book “Monetizing Misery”
Check out the entire table of contents of my new book “Monetizing Misery”
We are thrilled to announce the highly anticipated book trailer release of “Monetizing Misery”. This emotionally charged and thought-provoking video promotes the book which delves into the harsh realities of exploitation and profit-making off the suffering of people affected by vaccine injuries. “Monetizing Misery” sheds light on the dark underbelly of society and forces viewers to confront uncomfortable truths about well known people on the frontlines of the anti-vaccine movement. Get ready to be captivated and moved by this impactful and poignant book. Stay tuned for the official release date and mark your calendars to witness the unveiling of the new book by Greg Wyatt, “Monetizing Misery”.
Imagine adopting 2 perfectly healthy beautiful children only to see them regress after every “well baby” visit at the doctor. And imagine realizing that this devastating change was attributed to vaccines. Confronted with this grave situation and connecting with other similarly affected parents, I sought truth and assistance from authoritative figures. Enter Del Bigtree and the VaxXed black bus in July 2016—the beacon of hope promising justice and a brighter future. However, over time, as the glitter faded, I observed a disheartening pattern: the Vaxxed movement seemed less about amplifying our voices and more about monetizing misery.
5 STARS+++
“Monetizing Misery” by Greg Wyatt is a compelling exposé that delves deep into the intricacies of the health freedom movement, shedding light on the complex interplay between advocacy, manipulation, and financial exploitation. The book is an eye-opening account that not only exposes the movement’s dark underbelly but also provides a personal narrative that adds depth and authenticity to the author’s critique.
From the very first chapter, Wyatt sets the stage with a vivid recount of his journey into the health freedom movement. The foreword and introduction are particularly engaging, drawing readers into his world of personal tragedy and relentless pursuit of truth. Wyatt’s prose is both passionate and articulate, effectively conveying the emotional weight of his experiences while maintaining a critical and investigative tone.
The book is meticulously structured, with each section building upon the last to create a comprehensive and cohesive narrative. Wyatt’s decision to intersperse personal anecdotes with detailed research and analysis is particularly effective. This approach humanizes the broader issues discussed and underscores the real-world implications of the deceptive practices he exposes.
One of the standout features of “Monetizing Misery” is Wyatt’s thorough research. He meticulously documents his findings, providing readers with a wealth of evidence to support his claims. The inclusion of direct quotes, personal testimonies, and references to public records lends credibility to his assertions and invites readers to engage in their own research. This emphasis on transparency and critical thinking is a refreshing departure from the often one-sided narratives found in similar works.
Wyatt’s exploration of key figures in the health freedom movement is both insightful and revealing. His detailed profiles of individuals like Del Bigtree and Andrew Wakefield offer a nuanced perspective on their roles and motivations. Wyatt’s ability to uncover hidden connections and financial incentives adds a layer of intrigue to the narrative, making it clear that the movement is not as altruistic as it may appear.
The book’s structure, divided into multiple sections and chapters, allows for a deep dive into various aspects of the movement. Each chapter is carefully crafted to address specific topics, from the history of vaccine skepticism to the financial exploitation of vulnerable individuals. This methodical approach ensures that readers are not overwhelmed with information and can easily follow the progression of Wyatt’s arguments.
Wyatt’s writing is accessible and engaging, making complex topics understandable for a broad audience. His ability to balance detailed analysis with compelling storytelling keeps readers invested in the narrative from start to finish. Using vivid imagery and personal anecdotes adds a layer of emotional depth that makes the book both informative and moving.
One of the most powerful aspects of “Monetizing Misery” is Wyatt’s unwavering commitment to truth and justice. His personal sacrifices and relentless pursuit of transparency are evident throughout the book, underscoring the high stakes involved in exposing the dark side of the health freedom movement. This dedication adds a sense of urgency to the narrative, making it clear that the issues discussed have far-reaching implications.
However, the book is not without its flaws. Sometimes, the sheer volume of information can be overwhelming, and some sections may benefit from more concise editing. Additionally, while Wyatt’s critical perspective is necessary, a more balanced exploration of the positive aspects of the health freedom movement could provide a more well-rounded analysis.
Overall, “Monetizing Misery” is a must-read for anyone interested in the health freedom movement, vaccine skepticism, or the intersection of advocacy and financial exploitation. Wyatt’s meticulous research, engaging prose, and personal commitment to truth make this book a powerful and thought-provoking read. It is a testament to the importance of critical thinking, transparency, and the relentless pursuit of justice in the face of powerful and manipulative forces.
– Dan Bender, [6/23/2024 9:36 AM]
This 64-page document is the result of my first work 4-5 years ago. I had help with other people on the discover and investigation side.
This document presents a critical examination of Del Bigtree, where we see that he is manipulating the anti-vaccine movement and repurposing it into an effort advocating for safer vaccines. The most integral part of our skepticism is that Bigtree and his associates control the narrative around vaccine safety, marginalizing true dissenting voices. Del Bigtree’s rise to prominence appears fully orchestrated to act as controlled opposition, managing public perception through a strategy known as a limited hangout operation. This involves revealing partial truths about vaccine dangers to maintain credibility while continually redirecting the focus away from more radical, potentially disruptive truths.
Furthermore, we delve into Bigtree’s background, highlighting his transformation from Hollywood productions to a key figure in the anti-vaccine movement. We critically examine his family heritage, career moves, and the financial backing by wealthy donors like Bernard and Lisa Selz, who were significant influences in shaping his activism. We scrutinize Bigtree’s motivations and potential affiliations with Hollywood and Masonic symbolism, raising doubts about his integrity and leadership. We have deep skepticism towards Bigtree’s role and that his actions are part of a broader agenda aimed at consolidating control over public discourse on vaccine safety.
Also learn more about Del Bigtree in my upcoming book, Monetizing Misery!
Also watch this short video with Del Bigtree talking about “terrain theory” 👇👇👇
Why is Dell Big Tree promoting a vaccine confidence law as he works for RFK Jr as his national campaign director in his bid for President of the United States? If you can go to this video and politely tell her she needs to contact me for the entire truth behind the snake, that would be appreciated. If these con artists and liars get into the Whitehouse we’re sunk!
Also watch the followup by Peggy Hall, The Healthy American
When someone covers up their flim-flam operations with legitimate organizations, it is often referred to as a “front organization” or “front company”. This practice involves creating or using a legitimate-looking entity to disguise illegal or unethical activities, making it harder for authorities and the public to detect the underlying fraudulent actions.
ICAN and CHD are both political organizations by the rule of the law and are skirting around the regulations. They should be a 527 organization not a 501c3. They are collecting millions and millions of dollars and no one has any idea where it goes except Dell and Bobby and people just keep opening wallets and charging their credit cards and let’s not forget the pharmaceutical corporations that back there flim-flam operations. Don’t you find it strange that they have never accomplished anything concrete?
😔 😔 😔😔😔😔😔😔😔😔😔😔
Greg Wyatt was right all along and people still have a problem digesting the truth!
A political organization typically cannot be a government non-profit. Non-profit organizations are generally classified under section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, with various sub-sections specifying different types of non-profits. For example:
– **501(c)(3)** organizations are charitable non-profits that are restricted in their political activities.
– **501(c)(4)** organizations can engage in political activities, but their primary purpose must be promoting social welfare.
– **527** organizations are political organizations primarily for the purpose of influencing the election or appointment of individuals to public office.
Government agencies themselves are not considered non-profits; they are funded by taxpayer money and operate under different rules and regulations. However, non-profits can receive government grants and contracts to carry out specific projects or services.
To summarize, while a non-profit organization can engage in political activities, especially under the 501(c)(4) and 527 designations, it remains distinct from government agencies.
Learn more about the money and power grabs with Del Bigtree and RFK Jr.
Geo “Johnny” Cirucci, [4/7/2024 4:26 AM]
On Odysee, my flagship:
https://odysee.com/@Johnny_
Geo “Johnny” Cirucci, [4/7/2024 4:27 AM]
BitChute
https://www.bitchute.com/
Geo “Johnny” Cirucci, [4/7/2024 4:28 AM]
Rumble
https://rumble.com/v4nzznb-
Geo “Johnny” Cirucci, [4/7/2024 4:29 AM]
UGETube
https://ugetube.com/watch/
Watch my Facebook live from March 28, 2024
“We are not anti-vaccine”
It is utterly amazing that people want to argue with the fact that these are character actors playing a part. They claim they are anti-vaccine when they explicitly have said over and over again that they are not. Why don’t people hear them?
There’s a saying, “When people tell you who they are, believe them.”
Written by Daniel Alexander Zeck
March 9, 2023
(Facebook post)
Del Bigtree today. Wow.
To think that the no virus position is synonymous with allowing any of the bad actors to get off scot-free is absurd. What a poor misrepresentation of our position. We are trying to hold the majority of the allopathic system accountable, because much of it is built on the fraudulent pseudoscience of viroLIEgy.
No proof of virus would render any argument regarding the necessity or legitimacy of any of the measures totally ineffective, which would then potentially turn the hospital protocols, the shots, etc. intro an act of genocide rather than “we genuinely wanted to help, but we miscalculated some things and underestimated the harmful effects of the shot.”
Sure, a “gain of function virus” would possibly serve to incriminate *some* of these actors. That is, if we’re assuming the system will legitimately hold any of these people accountable (refer to all of the people who were involved with Ghislaine Maxwell and how she was the only one “held accountable”).
But what does gain of function serve in the long run, Del?
For this, read the excerpts from my recent article, An Open Letter to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree: https://aleczeck.substack.com/…/an-open-letter-to…:
“I want you both to think for a moment: within the context of germ hypothesis, which of the two has scarier implications for the future?: lab-made viruses funded by people with perceived nefarious intentions, shrouded in uncertainty and mystery, with greater lethal potential than their natural counterparts, or the one-in-gazillion chance natural virus that jumps from a bat to a pangolin to a human (is the pangolin still part of the story?) that rarely occurs across species? Again, neither of these are true whatsoever— both are completely unproven fantasies that make for great science-fiction movies. I believe “they” (whoever they are) are allowing gain of function to be discussed more frequently in mainstream conversations, and of course amongst the surface level alternative crowds where they’re carried by pseudo-celebrity alternative talking heads, to feint a controlled leak of the (completely false) “truth.” And all of the alternative talking heads and their followers shouted “see! Now the truth is out! The virus was made in a lab. Alas, we’ve solved the mystery of COVID.”
But have we? Or are we just setting ourselves up for this nonsense to continue Ad Infinitum? And this time it’s even worse: it’s being paraded around by the 3-year-censored alternative pundits. And as the mainstream position continues to lose its popularity with the controlled demolition of the death-cult, pharmaceutical backed narrative, the alternative talking heads will rise in popularity, and those who’ve not resolved their consciousness of blindly outsourcing to anyone, regardless of whether they’re alternative or mainstream, will take the future bait hook-line-and-sinker.”
Copyright © 2024 by Greg Wyatt
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |