Important Links…
Greg’s Blog…
Betrayal from Within: Understanding the Tactics of Planting Agents in Social Movements
/0 Comments
A “plant” refers to an agent strategically placed within an organization or group with the intent to gather intelligence or influence the group’s actions.
A plant could be inserted into a rival company, a foreign government, a criminal organization, or even a social movement.
Potential characteristics of a plant:
-Dual Loyalty: A plant must be convincing in their role and often have strong acting or deception skills.
-Access to Sensitive Information: Plants usually need to gain access to confidential or sensitive information. This might involve gaining the trust of key individuals or obtaining a position of responsibility.
-Long-term Operation: Being a plant is a long-term job. It can take time to gain the necessary trust and access to sensitive information.
-Training: Plants undergo extensive training which could involve learning about the culture and practices of the group they’re infiltrating.
From COINTEL 2.0
Who Really Shapes the Narrative of the Health Freedom Movement?
/1 Comment
A simplified hypothetical framework, based on historical precedents and intelligence strategies, might include the following steps:
Infiltration: The agency would begin by infiltrating the movement.
Recruitment: The agency could try to recruit insiders within the movement to act as informants or influence-brokers.
Information Warfare: Intelligence agencies often use information to shape perceptions and narratives.
Manipulation: Agents within the movement could attempt to manipulate its direction by proposing actions or policies that align with the agency’s objectives.
Provocation: In some cases, agencies may provoke the movement into taking actions that could discredit it or justify external intervention.
Transition: Once the current leadership is destabilized, the agency could seek to install leaders who are more susceptible to influence.
Consolidation: Once new leadership is in place, the agency would work to consolidate their position and guide the movement towards its objectives.
From COINTEL 2.0
Reputation Laundering: Kevin Tuttle
/0 CommentsFrom COINTEL 2.0
Reputation Laundering:
Air Force and USDA Public Affairs Officer Kevin Tuttle never discusses his GMO DarkAct activism.
He deleted his social media profiles before getting involved with the anti-vaccine movement.
Reputation Laundering is derived from “money laundering,” where illegal funds are processed through complex transactions to make them appear legitimate.
Similarly, in reputation laundering, an individual or organization attempts to cleanse their public image by dissociating from their controversial past and presenting a “clean” persona.
It could involve various tactics, such as shifting focus to philanthropic efforts, adopting new causes, making public apologies, or, in the digital realm, deleting social media accounts or posts that tie them to negative events.
The individual is potentially using reputation laundering techniques by deleting their social media profile before adopting a new cause, to create a disconnect from their past controversial actions.
Identity Manipulation:
This is a tactic often used in the intelligence field for nefarious purposes.
It involves creating a false persona or drastically modifying one’s existing identity to achieve a specific goal.
In the context of recent scenarios, the person is manipulating their identity from a wrongdoer to a reformed individual.
This tactic doesn’t necessarily denote a genuine change of heart or sincere repentance, but serves as a strategic maneuver to rebuild public trust and mitigate negative consequences.
Signals of Trust:
Consider Kevin Tuttle’s professional training and role(s) in perception management.
Signals of Trust are gestures or symbols used to foster trust or confer authenticity.
The individual could use religious rites or rituals as powerful symbols.
Participating in religious activities, displaying symbols of faith, or sharing religious quotes or teachings publicly can be seen as a commitment to a new path in many cultures.
By harnessing the emotional weight of these symbols and the cultural respect for religious practices, the individual seeks to add credibility to their narrative of reform.
The goal is to appeal to the emotional and cultural biases of their audience, encouraging them to view the individual’s supposed transformation as authentic and genuine.
Impression Management:
This concept has its roots in sociology and psychology but is commonly used in the field of social engineering.
It involves an individual or organization consciously controlling or influencing the way others perceive them.
This is often achieved by regulating and controlling information in social interaction.
Often, the individual uses impression management techniques to present themselves as a reformed person.
By publicly displaying symbols associated with trust and personal transformation, they’re trying to manipulate the perceptions of their social media followers.
The intention is to divert attention from their previous wrongdoings and to reconstruct their image into that of a repentant, changed individual.
From COINTEL 2.0
Its All Fake – Puerto Rico: Eugenics and Fake Revolution
/1 CommentPuerto Rico: Eugenics and Fake Revolution
Puerto Rico is a open air medical experiment
Article Archieved From – its-all-fake.com
Porto Ricochet Scandal
Two elite American doctors that jump started the Birth Control Pill and Vaccination agenda used Puerto Rico as a petri dish. The copy of a letter that led to revolution was a plant. Read more
Celebrity from “the health freedom movement” who is currently running for the US presidency
/0 CommentsClick on the above image to watch a video where I share some important thoughts that drive me… especially 666, Mark of the Beast.
Greg Wyatt