Written by Daniel Alexander Zeck
March 9, 2023
(Facebook post)

Del Bigtree today. Wow.
To think that the no virus position is synonymous with allowing any of the bad actors to get off scot-free is absurd. What a poor misrepresentation of our position. We are trying to hold the majority of the allopathic system accountable, because much of it is built on the fraudulent pseudoscience of viroLIEgy.

No proof of virus would render any argument regarding the necessity or legitimacy of any of the measures totally ineffective, which would then potentially turn the hospital protocols, the shots, etc. intro an act of genocide rather than “we genuinely wanted to help, but we miscalculated some things and underestimated the harmful effects of the shot.”
Sure, a “gain of function virus” would possibly serve to incriminate *some* of these actors. That is, if we’re assuming the system will legitimately hold any of these people accountable (refer to all of the people who were involved with Ghislaine Maxwell and how she was the only one “held accountable”).

But what does gain of function serve in the long run, Del?

For this, read the excerpts from my recent article, An Open Letter to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree: https://aleczeck.substack.com/…/an-open-letter-to…:

“I want you both to think for a moment: within the context of germ hypothesis, which of the two has scarier implications for the future?: lab-made viruses funded by people with perceived nefarious intentions, shrouded in uncertainty and mystery, with greater lethal potential than their natural counterparts, or the one-in-gazillion chance natural virus that jumps from a bat to a pangolin to a human (is the pangolin still part of the story?) that rarely occurs across species? Again, neither of these are true whatsoever— both are completely unproven fantasies that make for great science-fiction movies. I believe “they” (whoever they are) are allowing gain of function to be discussed more frequently in mainstream conversations, and of course amongst the surface level alternative crowds where they’re carried by pseudo-celebrity alternative talking heads, to feint a controlled leak of the (completely false) “truth.” And all of the alternative talking heads and their followers shouted “see! Now the truth is out! The virus was made in a lab. Alas, we’ve solved the mystery of COVID.”

But have we? Or are we just setting ourselves up for this nonsense to continue Ad Infinitum? And this time it’s even worse: it’s being paraded around by the 3-year-censored alternative pundits. And as the mainstream position continues to lose its popularity with the controlled demolition of the death-cult, pharmaceutical backed narrative, the alternative talking heads will rise in popularity, and those who’ve not resolved their consciousness of blindly outsourcing to anyone, regardless of whether they’re alternative or mainstream, will take the future bait hook-line-and-sinker.”