“Controlled opposition” refers to a tactic often employed by those in power to manipulate and control public dissent or opposition movements. It involves the creation or support of opposition groups or individuals who appear to challenge the existing order but are actually controlled or influenced by the establishment. The purpose behind controlled opposition is to maintain control over the narrative and prevent genuine opposition from gaining traction or threatening the status quo. In essence, controlled opposition is a strategy to co-opt and manipulate dissent, rather than genuinely addressing or resolving the underlying issues or concerns raised by the opposition.
Take a look at this video of Del Bigtree on his own show “The Highwire” and see and hear in plain sight what his real truth is. He is definitely controlled opposition and leader of the mindless who has repeatedly stated that he has and would take money from pHarma.
“We Are Winning!”
How many times has Del Bigtree parroted this lie?
Despite Del Bigtree’s claims of victory, it seems that he is only fooling himself with his self-proclaimed successes.
Del is the winner unfortunately. Del Bigtree is his own biggest fan. There is no audience. What substance is he on? It’s easy to see. Watch carefully and post your comments below.
“We are not anti-vaccine”
It is utterly amazing that people want to argue with the fact that these are character actors playing a part. They claim they are anti-vaccine when they explicitly have said over and over again that they are not. Why don’t people hear them?
There’s a saying, “When people tell you who they are, believe them.”
In this video I ask for you to see read Kevin Tuttle’s Instagram posts and look at his demeanor as well as what he is saying in his videos. Is he a groomer? See for yourself.
It was in the year 2000, where he was being groomed to be another Del Bigtree clone by Del himself. Search my blog archives to see so much more!
In this post we unveil the deception behind the January 6th Insurrection. Denise Marie (aka The Informed Mama) is a government plant along with her fellow syndicate member Del Bigtree and fellow cast of thousands. Del Bigtree’s ultimate goal was to create a revolution for his hatred against the citizens of the USA using his pro-health pro-choice quasi anti-vaccine movement and his blind-faith followers.
Also, please read my blog post from 2022 on this subject.
https://gregwyatt.net/from-the-capitol-to-the-city-council-how-extremism-in-the-u-s-shifted-after-jan-6/
There is a lot of deception in the health freedom movement. How to End the Autism Epidemic was originally written by controlled opposition J.B. Handley and Del Bigtree’s personal friend. It was nothing more than a pro-vaccine manual for big pHarma that recommend vaccines. Many people were so asleep that they didn’t see it! Watch this video to WAKE UP!
Also see my previous post from 2021 below.
The story has it that Andrew Wakefield ran across Tia Severino in West Hollywood California when she was working the circuit trying to gain Fame being an actress and singer. She is a public figure working the grift for the nonprofits and charity puppeteers! The cult runs deep my friends. Dig deep on this woman and you will find out that little is what It seems with this group of misfits actors and actresses?
Written by Daniel Alexander Zeck
March 9, 2023
(Facebook post)
Del Bigtree today. Wow.
To think that the no virus position is synonymous with allowing any of the bad actors to get off scot-free is absurd. What a poor misrepresentation of our position. We are trying to hold the majority of the allopathic system accountable, because much of it is built on the fraudulent pseudoscience of viroLIEgy.
No proof of virus would render any argument regarding the necessity or legitimacy of any of the measures totally ineffective, which would then potentially turn the hospital protocols, the shots, etc. intro an act of genocide rather than “we genuinely wanted to help, but we miscalculated some things and underestimated the harmful effects of the shot.”
Sure, a “gain of function virus” would possibly serve to incriminate *some* of these actors. That is, if we’re assuming the system will legitimately hold any of these people accountable (refer to all of the people who were involved with Ghislaine Maxwell and how she was the only one “held accountable”).
But what does gain of function serve in the long run, Del?
For this, read the excerpts from my recent article, An Open Letter to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree: https://aleczeck.substack.com/…/an-open-letter-to…:
“I want you both to think for a moment: within the context of germ hypothesis, which of the two has scarier implications for the future?: lab-made viruses funded by people with perceived nefarious intentions, shrouded in uncertainty and mystery, with greater lethal potential than their natural counterparts, or the one-in-gazillion chance natural virus that jumps from a bat to a pangolin to a human (is the pangolin still part of the story?) that rarely occurs across species? Again, neither of these are true whatsoever— both are completely unproven fantasies that make for great science-fiction movies. I believe “they” (whoever they are) are allowing gain of function to be discussed more frequently in mainstream conversations, and of course amongst the surface level alternative crowds where they’re carried by pseudo-celebrity alternative talking heads, to feint a controlled leak of the (completely false) “truth.” And all of the alternative talking heads and their followers shouted “see! Now the truth is out! The virus was made in a lab. Alas, we’ve solved the mystery of COVID.”
But have we? Or are we just setting ourselves up for this nonsense to continue Ad Infinitum? And this time it’s even worse: it’s being paraded around by the 3-year-censored alternative pundits. And as the mainstream position continues to lose its popularity with the controlled demolition of the death-cult, pharmaceutical backed narrative, the alternative talking heads will rise in popularity, and those who’ve not resolved their consciousness of blindly outsourcing to anyone, regardless of whether they’re alternative or mainstream, will take the future bait hook-line-and-sinker.”
Erin Olszewski’s admission of receiving psychological operations training in Oregon has raised questions about her controversial associations and the use of donation funds in her various non-profit ventures.
In Oregon, Erin Olszewski stated she received psychological operations training at Fort Bragg.
It is the first time she admitted this fact publicly.
She focused on her “undercover nurse” stint in New York.
However, many do not know she worked intimately with Scientology’s DC lobbyist, Greg Mitchell and Lincoln Project’s Jonathan Lockwood.
Between 2018 through 2020, Olszewski created multiple non-profits as documented on this channel and elsewhere. For example, she abandoned Florida Freedom Alliance in 2019 within three months of it forming.
Finally, Kevin Tuttle assisted Erin Olszewski to orchestrate protests and the creation of multiple non-profit companies.
Kevin Tuttle is a “former” Air Force Public Affairs officer, also training at Fort Bragg. He also created a shell non-profit supposedly to help parents of vaccine-injured children.
Where did the collected money go? How’s that for a psyop?
The cultivation of moles and the establishment of influence operations is a disturbing subject, and the case of Heather Simpson exemplifies how her rapid ascent as an influencer is not an anomaly.
The case of Heather Simpson is noteworthy because her quick rise as an influencer is not a statistical outlier.
Force Officer Kevin Tuttle established a pattern of cultivating questionable assets like Lynette Marie Barron for Del Bigtree and vaccine patent holder Doctor Paul Offit.
It is speculated by many that Del Bigtree and Paul Offit provided the financial means for Lynette Marie Barron to travel from state-to-state to solidify her role as a legitimate activist.
Much like Heather Simpson, media organizations provided Barron an opportunity to become a public figure and a voice representing the health freedom movement.
With the assistance of Kevin Tuttle, Barron’s role as an activist would be particularly valuable in this respect, providing her sponsors with insights into operations, funding sources, and high-level decision-making.