This is the problem as I see it.

And yes, I understand the arguments that we must “meet people where they’re at,” and that CHD is tailored towards a larger audience, although I totally disagree with it.

We don’t want “safer” vaccines.

The entire premise of vaccination is pseudoscientific, as all of it is based on virology. There is no possible benefit of vaccination. This is why it IS a big deal that CHD refuses to give any attention to the no virus issue while continuing to pump Gain of Function voices.

Look, if CHD wants to focus exclusively on the safety of vaccines, fine. But that argument doesn’t hold water when they continue to pump gain of fiction, driving people to be fearful of future “variants” and new “lab-made viruses” while refusing to cover the other side of the issue–the actual truth–that there is no proof that adheres to the scientific method, or to logic, that these sub-microscopic, pathogenic particles exist or cause any sort of disease.