Del Bigtree Exposed

Is Del Bigtree a Controlled Opposition Figure in the Anti-Vaccine Movement?

/0 Comments

First published Jun 13, 2024
Updated January 16, 2025
Del Bigtree Exposed

This 64-page document represents the culmination of my earliest investigative work, undertaken approximately 4–5 years ago. It is the product of collaborative efforts, as I worked alongside a dedicated group of individuals on this project’s discovery and investigative aspects. Together, we sought to uncover deeper truths surrounding the controversial figure of Del Bigtree and his role within the anti-vaccine movement.

The document critically examines Del Bigtree, revealing a concerning pattern of manipulation and narrative control. Our analysis highlights how Bigtree has strategically repurposed the anti-vaccine movement into a platform advocating for “safer vaccines,” effectively diluting the voices of genuine dissenters. Central to our skepticism is the observation that Bigtree and his associates exert significant influence over the conversation about vaccine safety, steering it in ways that marginalize or suppress more radical perspectives that could challenge the status quo.

Del Bigtree’s rise to prominence appears to be anything but organic. Evidence suggests his ascent was carefully orchestrated to position him as a controlled opposition figure. This strategy, known as a limited hangout operation, involves the selective disclosure of partial truths about vaccine risks to maintain credibility while diverting attention from deeper, potentially more disruptive realities. This approach maintains public trust while ensuring the broader narrative remains manageable and aligned with specific agendas.

The document also delves into Bigtree’s personal and professional background, offering insights into his transition from Hollywood producer to a leading figure in the vaccine safety debate. Analyzing his career trajectory reveals connections and affiliations that raise serious questions about his motivations. Of particular note is the significant financial support he has received from influential donors like Bernard and Lisa Selz. This funding has not only facilitated Bigtree’s rise but also suggests the possibility of a broader, coordinated effort to shape his activism and influence within the movement.
Additionally, we explore the symbolic and ideological underpinnings of Bigtree’s work, scrutinizing elements of his public persona and messaging that appear to align with Hollywood and Masonic symbolism. These findings contribute to our concerns about his authenticity and integrity as a leader. Our research suggests that his actions may be part of a larger agenda aimed at consolidating control over public discourse on vaccine safety, ensuring that the conversation remains within acceptable boundaries dictated by external influences.

This document sheds light on the complexities and contradictions surrounding Del Bigtree, encouraging readers to question the motives and authenticity of prominent figures within the vaccine safety movement. By exposing these dynamics, we hope to empower individuals to seek unfiltered truths and resist the manipulation of narratives designed to constrain genuine dissent.

Read it here.

Also learn more about Del Bigtree in my upcoming book, Monetizing Misery!

Also watch this short video with Del Bigtree talking about “terrain theory” 👇👇👇

 

RFK Junior Leaked call with Trump

The “Safer Vaccines” Narrative Gains Increased Attention During Leaked Phone Call Between Trump and RFK Jr.

/0 Comments

The narrative for “safer vaccines” is definitely getting more attention lately. As you know, Del Bigtree has been talking about them for a long time and more recently with his “Vaccine Confidence Law” that he is working on with RFK Jr., as his national campaign director. RFK Jr. has admitted on several occasions that he has had his whole family jabbed because he believes in them “emphatically”.

This clip was allegedly “leaked” to the public by RFK’s son, which was then deleted. This tactic is common, to release something that the general public will see as some juicy news we weren’t supposed to see. Yet, this is not the truth. This is a script that they are playing out to normalize the conversation about “safer vaccines”.

This time it’s Trump, Mr. Operation Warp Speed himself, bringing it into the conversation with RFK Jr. claiming that he thinks its nuts that babies get so many vaccines right away. Trump claimed during the call that “too many times” vaccinated children “all of the sudden starting to change radically.”

This is all theatre for the general public. I believe it was intentionally put out there to regain support and trust by the Trumpers who hated his COVID stance.

Why would Trump be talking about vaccines with all the recent commotion about him being shot? It’s all very staged and unrealistic, especially since he had the phone call on speakerphone.

Here’s the transcript:

Trump: “And clearly there is something wrong with that whole system. And, uh, I just say doctors (unintelligible), remember as in I want to do small doses…. small doses… when you, when you see a baby, Bobbie, uh and vaccination that is like 38 different vaccines and it looks like its meant for a horse, not a 10 or 20 pound baby. It looks like you’re giving, you should be giving a horse this. And do you see the size of it, there was this massive, and then you see the baby all of the sudden starting to change radically. I’ve seen it too many times. And then you hear that it doesn’t have an impact. Right? But you’re onto that a long time ago. And, uh, anyway, uh, I would be, I would love you to do so and I think it would be so good for your and so good for you. And we’re gonna win. We’re way ahead of the guy, and Hillary’s interest. He was very nice actually. He called me and he said “How did you choose to move to the right?” …… (unintelligible) I was just showing that you. I didn’t have to tell him the truck of all the people pouring into our country. But ahh… I just turned my head to share the joy and some rapped me. It sounded like a giant. Like the world’s largest mosquito. And uh… it was. It was a bullet going round. You know, its… what do they call that an AR-15 or something? That was a big gun. That was a pretty, pretty tough gun.”

Monetizing Misery Trailer

Announcing the Highly Anticipated Book Trailer Release of “Monetizing Misery” 📗🎉✨

/0 Comments

We are thrilled to announce the highly anticipated book trailer release of “Monetizing Misery”. This emotionally charged and thought-provoking video promotes the book which delves into the harsh realities of exploitation and profit-making off the suffering of people affected by vaccine injuries. “Monetizing Misery” sheds light on the dark underbelly of society and forces viewers to confront uncomfortable truths about well known people on the frontlines of the anti-vaccine movement. Get ready to be captivated and moved by this impactful and poignant book. Stay tuned for the official release date and mark your calendars to witness the unveiling of the new book by Greg Wyatt, “Monetizing Misery”.

Imagine adopting 2 perfectly healthy beautiful children only to see them regress after every “well baby” visit at the doctor. And imagine realizing that this devastating change was attributed to vaccines. Confronted with this grave situation and connecting with other similarly affected parents, I sought truth and assistance from authoritative figures. Enter Del Bigtree and the VaxXed black bus in July 2016—the beacon of hope promising justice and a brighter future. However, over time, as the glitter faded, I observed a disheartening pattern: the Vaxxed movement seemed less about amplifying our voices and more about monetizing misery.

 

Duped By an Organization

Why Do People Struggle to Acknowledge Being Duped By an Organization or Charity?

/0 Comments

Duped By an Organization

People who have been duped by an organization or charity often struggle to acknowledge it due to several psychological and social factors:

1. **Cognitive Dissonance**:

Admitting they were deceived creates a conflict between their beliefs and reality. To reduce this discomfort, they might rationalize their decision or continue supporting the organization.

2. **Sunk Cost Fallacy**:

People feel compelled to justify their past investments (time, money, effort) by continuing to support the organization rather than accepting the loss.

3. **Identity and Ego Protection**:

Acknowledging they were duped can feel like a personal failure, challenging their self-image and leading to feelings of embarrassment or shame.

4. **Social Pressure**:

If they are part of a community that supports the organization, admitting they were deceived can lead to social isolation or backlash.

5. **Hope and Optimism**:

People often cling to the hope that their trust was not misplaced and that the organization will eventually deliver on its promises.

6. **Misinformation and Denial**:

They might lack access to accurate information or be in denial about reality due to a continuous stream of misleading information from the organization.

 

 

Del Bigtree ICAN

Front Organizations and Flim-Flam Operations: Uncovering Deceptive Business Practices

/1 Comment

When someone covers up their flim-flam operations with legitimate organizations, it is often referred to as a “front organization” or “front company”. This practice involves creating or using a legitimate-looking entity to disguise illegal or unethical activities, making it harder for authorities and the public to detect the underlying fraudulent actions.

Del Bigtree ICAN

ICAN and CHD are both political organizations by the rule of the law and are skirting around the regulations. They should be a 527 organization not a 501c3. They are collecting millions and millions of dollars and no one has any idea where it goes except Dell and Bobby and people just keep opening wallets and charging their credit cards and let’s not forget the pharmaceutical corporations that back there flim-flam operations. Don’t you find it strange that they have never accomplished anything concrete?

😔 😔 😔😔😔😔😔😔😔😔😔😔

Greg Wyatt was right all along and people still have a problem digesting the truth!

A political organization typically cannot be a government non-profit. Non-profit organizations are generally classified under section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, with various sub-sections specifying different types of non-profits. For example:
– **501(c)(3)** organizations are charitable non-profits that are restricted in their political activities.
– **501(c)(4)** organizations can engage in political activities, but their primary purpose must be promoting social welfare.
– **527** organizations are political organizations primarily for the purpose of influencing the election or appointment of individuals to public office.

Government agencies themselves are not considered non-profits; they are funded by taxpayer money and operate under different rules and regulations. However, non-profits can receive government grants and contracts to carry out specific projects or services.

To summarize, while a non-profit organization can engage in political activities, especially under the 501(c)(4) and 527 designations, it remains distinct from government agencies.

Del Bigtree Germ vs Terrain

The Virus Lie and Unmasking the Real Accountability Crisis

/1 Comment

Written by Daniel Alexander Zeck
March 9, 2023
(Facebook post)

Del Bigtree today. Wow.
To think that the no virus position is synonymous with allowing any of the bad actors to get off scot-free is absurd. What a poor misrepresentation of our position. We are trying to hold the majority of the allopathic system accountable, because much of it is built on the fraudulent pseudoscience of viroLIEgy.

No proof of virus would render any argument regarding the necessity or legitimacy of any of the measures totally ineffective, which would then potentially turn the hospital protocols, the shots, etc. intro an act of genocide rather than “we genuinely wanted to help, but we miscalculated some things and underestimated the harmful effects of the shot.”
Sure, a “gain of function virus” would possibly serve to incriminate *some* of these actors. That is, if we’re assuming the system will legitimately hold any of these people accountable (refer to all of the people who were involved with Ghislaine Maxwell and how she was the only one “held accountable”).

But what does gain of function serve in the long run, Del?

For this, read the excerpts from my recent article, An Open Letter to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree: https://aleczeck.substack.com/…/an-open-letter-to…:

“I want you both to think for a moment: within the context of germ hypothesis, which of the two has scarier implications for the future?: lab-made viruses funded by people with perceived nefarious intentions, shrouded in uncertainty and mystery, with greater lethal potential than their natural counterparts, or the one-in-gazillion chance natural virus that jumps from a bat to a pangolin to a human (is the pangolin still part of the story?) that rarely occurs across species? Again, neither of these are true whatsoever— both are completely unproven fantasies that make for great science-fiction movies. I believe “they” (whoever they are) are allowing gain of function to be discussed more frequently in mainstream conversations, and of course amongst the surface level alternative crowds where they’re carried by pseudo-celebrity alternative talking heads, to feint a controlled leak of the (completely false) “truth.” And all of the alternative talking heads and their followers shouted “see! Now the truth is out! The virus was made in a lab. Alas, we’ve solved the mystery of COVID.”

But have we? Or are we just setting ourselves up for this nonsense to continue Ad Infinitum? And this time it’s even worse: it’s being paraded around by the 3-year-censored alternative pundits. And as the mainstream position continues to lose its popularity with the controlled demolition of the death-cult, pharmaceutical backed narrative, the alternative talking heads will rise in popularity, and those who’ve not resolved their consciousness of blindly outsourcing to anyone, regardless of whether they’re alternative or mainstream, will take the future bait hook-line-and-sinker.”

Vaccinomics

/0 Comments

RFK Jr. and his nonprofit charity CHD pushing the vaccine agenda.

Bias Virus-Pushers

/0 Comments
Why are Del Bigtree of the Highwire and RFK Jr of Children’s Health Defense half truthers and virus pushers leading the Health Freedom Movement?
Controlled opposition are always carefully placed!

The HighWire presents itself as a voice of dissent or as an alternative to mainstream media outlets. However, this is completely disingenuous, as The HighWire itself is funded by wealthy donors and operates within a larger network of like-minded individuals and organizations. It’s becoming clear who is  behind The HighWire and what their motivations actually are.

The Virus Lie & Mary Holland of CHD

The Virus Lie & Mary Holland of CHD

/3 Comments

Mary Holland is the General Counsel and Vice Chairman of Children’s Health Defense (CHD). She is responsible for the legal and policy initiatives, including litigation and advocacy efforts. Holland has a background in international human rights, law, and advocacy, having worked as a research scholar and director of the Graduate Lawyering Program at New York University School of Law.


A video worth watching!

Why does RFK Jr. of Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and Del Bigtree of ICAN wildly promote the fraud of the unproven Virus Theory over the proven truth of Terrain Theory? Perhaps because they would lose all of their pharmaceutical funding and be exposed as the frauds?

Greg Wyatt Interviewed by Tom Quinn on KSCO RADIO (Updated)

/3 Comments

Greg Wyatt was interviewed on the Tom Quinn show in Santa Cruz, CA that aired on KSCO-AM on Jan 21, 2022 sharing his research on Del Matthew Bigtree, his charity and RFK Jr and his charity.

UPDATE: We now have a transcript of the interview here:
https://gregwyatt.net/ksco-interview-transcript/

Copyright © 2025 by Greg Wyatt