This Proves RFK Jr. Knows Viruses Don’t Exist
This proves RFK Jr. knows viruses don’t exist but continues to promote the CovidCon that was a weaponized virus.
RFK-Jr-Holland-Dec-2022-PACKAGE-redactedAnd here is an interview with Christine Massey where she explains what she has figured out.
I think Massey has said that she first became a no-viruser after she heard an interview of Andrew Kaufman. But I think Kaufman might be a disinformation agent, and it’s suspicious how he and other early promoters of the theory that the SARS 2 virus does not exist are linked to the flat earth psyop. See this HTML file for a long version with links to sources: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zdsOm3LvgBv5OdSVnxSdpAou6mv7WMrA . I don’t want to publish my research, so please don’t post my HTML file anywhere. But the following is a much shorter version of my HTML file without links to sources:
The first video on Andrew Kaufman’s YouTube channel is an interview that he did with James True in November 2019, and the description of the video says that it was Kaufman’s debut interview. However Kaufman’s interview was focused on general health-related topics, and he did not yet present his theory that viruses are non-pathogenic exosomes. I think he first presented his theory in March 2020 when he did interviews with the flat earthers Crrow777, Secrets of Saturn, Richie from Boston, and James True. James True said on Twitter that he was Kaufman’s “lead writer”. On Kaufman’s YouTube channel, the first video where he presented his theory of viruses was a clip of his presentation which was part of a livestream posted on James True’s YouTube channel. The original livestream also featured discussion of Kaufman’s presentation by a panel of six flat earthers. True’s original livestream included links to 16 websites which were used as sources in the presentation, and it also included a link to a PowerPoint file of Kaufman’s presentation which was hosted on True’s website, but none of the links were included in the clip of the presentation posted on Kaufman’s channel. James True has also hosted PowerPoint files for his own YouTube videos on his website. During the presentation, Kaufman gave thanks to three people who had helped get his message out, but they were all flat earthers, and Kaufman also said: “I want to especially thank James True who has been a great friend, confidant, and collaborator throughout this whole thing”. In April 2020, James True tweeted a link to a page on his website for sending him donations, and he wrote: “My Dr. Kaufman vid has been seen over 200k times in 5 days. I am employing myself, one editor, and one producer and we could use a video editor for maximum effect.” A few days later James True tweeted: “I have emptied my patreon account on editors, publishing, and pushing Dr Kaufman’s video.” I think James True may also have written the script of Kaufman’s film “Hippocratic Hypocrisy”, because the film featured an extensive discussion about the occult meaning of the Staff of Asclepius and the Caduceus of Hermes, which was also the main theme of one of James True’s livestreams. However Kaufman later had a falling out with True, so I don’t know how long True continued to be Kaufman’s “lead writer”.
James True has made a bunch of tweets like this: “Satan is the fall of man. Lucifer is the rise. King James didn’t want people to rise. The Golden Dawn is why we are all here. It is the goal of the Great Work.” And he also tweeted: “Masons believe lying is good for the people. They seek to bring an age of enlightenment. They lie to bring Lucifer.” He also advocated for lying in several other tweets, and for example he tweeted: “If no one lied, no one would discern. Lies open our discernment. Parents lie to their child to open their discernment.” And his tweets are full of Masonic concepts like the Great Work or the Phoenix rising from the ashes, like for example: “Awareness is the understanding that we are all illuminating ourselves. Just like when we chose long ago to enslave ourselves. The Great Work is rapture. A baptism through psychology. Phoenix fire.”
I think the second person after James True who interviewed Kaufman was Crrow777. In episode 425 of his podcast, Crrow777 said that he has “talked to so many people that I was in the Marine Corps with that were Masons”. His name probably comes from Aleister Crowley’s text titled “777” or from how 777 is a significant number in Thelema. The book “777 And Other Qabalistic Writings of Aleister Crowley: Including Gematria & Sepher Sephiroth” was edited by Israel Regardie who was born into an Orthodox Jewish family in London. Crowley’s text “777” discussed the teachings of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, but James True has posted several tweets about the Golden Dawn, and Kaufman did a livestream with James True and Benjamin Balderson about Hermetic principles. In a video that James True did about Freemasonry with Marty Leeds, they both defended Freemasonry and said that Masons are misunderstood, and they both had detailed knowledge about Masonry even though claimed to not be Freemasons. The username of Marty Leeds on various websites is martyleeds33. Marty Leeds and Benjamin Balderson were both speakers at the flat earth conference Flatoberfest 2022, which was held at the Greenville Shrine Club & Event Center in Greenville, SC. The website of the event center says that “Shriners are members of the Masonic Fraternity and adhere to the principles of Freemasonry”. The Facebook page of Flatoberfest 2022 was registered by United For Good Information whose email address on Facebook is the address of Crrow777’s wife. The population of Greenville is only about 70,000, but Freeman Fly who was one of Kaufman’s six panelists also lives in Greenville.
James True tweeted that he first met Kaufman in the summer of 2019 on a retreat of the Omega Institute for Holistic Studies in Rhinebeck in upstate New York. In 2020, True posted two videos from a retreat of the Omega Institute where he discussed alchemy and demons together with Amandha Vollmer and Benjamin Balderson, who are both flat earthers. The Omega Institute was built on the former grounds of a Yiddish camp, they have a library named after the Jewish guru Ram Dass who taught at the institute, and their president is a feminist named Goldstein who used to work for Planned Parenthood. The chair of Omega Institute’s board of directors is married to a grandson of FDR, and she is also the chair of an organization which was co-founded by Hillary Clinton and by someone whose grandfather was a leader of the Jewish diamond merchants of Antwerp.
The flat earther Amandha Vollmer started mirroring videos by Stefan Lanka on YouTube in January 2020. Vollmer did a presentation about Lanka’s theory at EVENT 202 which was organized by the British flat earther Allegedly Dave. Another speaker at EVENT 202 was the ex-military flat earther Shelley Lewis who made a flat earth film together with the ex-military flat earther Joshua Michael Gennari. James True has also tweeted that he is ex-military and that “me and my entire family are military”. Another speaker at EVENT 202 was the flat earther Mark Devlin, who was one of the five speakers in a screening of a movie by Crow777 and Jason Lindgren in NYC. The website of EVENT 202 was last updated in 2021, but by then it had been repurposed to promote a bunch of very grassroots “health freedom rallies” in the UK. Many of the rallies featured David Icke as a speaker, and some rallies also featured a remote video presentation by Kaufman.
Kaufman’s film “Hippocratic Hypocrisy” was produced and narrated by the flat earth channel Spacebusters, who later published another similar film which featured both Kaufman and Cowan. Spacebusters have now also made a deal to produce another feature-length film for Sam Bailey, and they have done English voiceovers for Stefan Lanka’s videos. Steve Falconer who narrates most videos by Spacebusters sounds like a professional narrator, but a few videos by Spacebusters are narrated by a different person who has a British accent and who also sounds like a professional narrator, which makes Spacebusters seem like a very grassroots operation. In early March 2020 before Kaufman had first presented his theory about viruses, Spacebusters posted a video where Aajonus Vonderplanitz talked about how viruses are solvents and how polio is not a viral disease. A clip of another similar presentation by Vonderplanitz was posted in March 2020 by the flat earther David Weiss. Weiss said that he was first turned into a flat earther by Sofia Smallstorm. Smallstorm began to promote the theory that the SARS 2 virus does not exist in an interview with the flat earther Jeranism in March 2020. Another early promoter of the theory was Max Igan, who in January 2020 said that he believes in flat earth, but a few days later he said that he was being targeted with mind control technology and he doesn’t actually believe in flat earth. However in 2016, Max Igan also posted a video about his flight from Chile to Australia which was supposed to provide evidence for the flat earth theory because his compass was supposedly pointing in the wrong direction, and his video was then discussed by the flat earthers Jeranism and Globebusters. Max Igan, David Weiss, and Spacebusters have all posted videos about mud floods and Tartaria. The first mud flood YouTuber was the Russian flat earther Philipp Druzhinin. In 2018, several flat earthers changed the main focus of their channel to Tartaria or mud floods or how history is fake, including Barnabas Nagy, captain kirk, Martin Liedtke, Richard Lopez, and UAP. But I think that in the same way that in 2018 flat earthers were deployed to popularize the theories about Tartaria and mud floods, later in early 2020 flat earthers were deployed to popularize the theory that the SARS 2 virus does not exist.
Before David Weiss turned into a flat earther, he had a Facebook page called “The Big Three” which was about 9/11, Sandy Hook, and the Boston bombing, and he promoted the same kind of disinformation as Jim Fetzer about all three. Weiss was featured as a guest on Fetzer’s podcast twice in 2014. The other time he was accompanied by a Hollywood producer who first questioned the Boston bombing on a radio program of Voice of Russia, and his comments on the radio show were then turned into an written article by Dr. Eowyn. In 2014, someone named David Weiss played the role of Jeffrey S. Salley in a documentary about the Boston bombing made by National Geographic. Weiss did interviews about the Boston bombing together with Peekay Truth, who has also had minor roles in two Australian films, who was accused of harrassing Sandy Hook families, who in 2016 in an interview with Weiss came out of the closet and said that the earth is probably flat, and who in an interview with Fetzer in 2021 said that the SARS 2 virus is not real. David Weiss was also the administrator of Wolfgang Halbig’s Facebook page, he set up Halbig’s Paypal and GoFundMe accounts, and he helped settle Halbig’s copyright claims. In 2014, Weiss accompanied Wolfgang Halbig to an event where Halbig lectured to an audience of around 200 Oath Keepers about Sandy Hook, and Dr. Eowyn wrote an article about the event based on notes by Weiss. In 2022 it was revealed that over 300 Oath Keepers were current or former members of the DHS or its subagencies. Dr. Eowyn also wrote parts of Fetzer’s book about Sandy Hook. In 2016 it was revealed that Dr. Eowyn’s real name is Maria Hsia Chang and that she had written a book where she defended the Falun Gong. Her other books and academic papers are basically focused on promoting the line of the Epoch Times on East Asian policy. Her old bio said that she “is a lecturer for the U. S. Department of Defense’s Joint Counterintelligence Training Academy, as well as the U. S. Marine Corps War College”. Her husband was named to the “Oppenheimer Chair of Warfighting Strategy 1996-1997” at the Marine Corps University. Fetzer also served in the Marine Corps, and Halbig made his alt media debut by being interviewed by Dave Gahary, who says that he is a former submariner for the U.S. navy. Gahary was listed as the principal officer at Jim Fetzer’s publishing company Moon Rock Books.
—
I also sent my HTML file to Massey, and I told her to listen to these presentations by Saint Nick about the laboratory origin of HIV: https://rumble.com/user/SaintNickofTime . You can start with the level 100 and level 200 videos. If what Nick and Alan Cantwell and Len Horowitz say is true and HIV is a man-made bioweapon, then it cannot simultaneously be true that HIV does not exist like Stefan Lanka says. And if Peter Duesberg is a disinformation agent like Nick and Horowitz say, then it makes you wonder if they’re promoting similar type of disinformation about COVID.
(Two months ago Jonathan Jay Couey basically started to promote a lite version of the no-virus theory, but I think it might be because he’s now a paid consultant for RFK so he may have been compromised. His new theory is that strains of SARS 2 quickly revert to a nonpathogenic form in the wild but it’s only synthetic RNA clones of SARS 2 that are dangerous, which is similar to what Mary Holland wrote in her first email to Massey. Couey recently streamed Vaxxed and Vaxxed 2 on Twitch. And he said that the CHD is the only banner you should rally under and that you should be suspicious of anyone who criticizes RFK. But that’s another story…)
I don’t know if you rejected my earlier comment where I posted a short version of my HTML file about how I believe that Andrew Kaufman and company are disinformation agents. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zdsOm3LvgBv5OdSVnxSdpAou6mv7WMrA) But maybe you’ll allow me to post the section of my HTML file which deals with the genetic sequencing of viruses. I hope you try to follow my tutorials on how to do a BLAST search for a SARS 2 raw read or how to assemble the raw reads in a FASTQ file. I have earlier sent both tutorials to Christine Massey, but she refused to follow them and she just said that I was lost in “delusional technocracy”.
Anyway, the following is Stefan Lanka’s explanation for how the genetic sequencing of what are alleged to be viruses works: “Based on the sequence data generated in the first round of nucleic acid propagation, short pieces of nucleic acids are biochemically generated for the propagation of nucleic acids by PCR, so-called primers. These artificially generated primers themselves yield, depending on the protocol, approximately 4-20% of the sequence alignment of what is ultimately presented, after this second step of PCR propagation, as the sequence alignment of SARS-CoV-2. This second PCR propagation step for the subsequent mathematical, called bioinformatic formation of the sequence is called, among other things, deep meta-transcriptomic sequencing. The fact that an extremely unscientifically high number of cycles of PCR is applied here (35-45, so-called Ct value), in which artificial nucleic acid sequences are automatically generated that do not exist in reality, is further proof of the anti-scientific nature of virology, but plays no role in the argumentation presented here. It is evident from points 1. and 2. that no genetic strand of a virus was ever found. Instead, existing fragments of nucleic acids were first multiplied biochemically, by means of double PCR, strongly and with an extremely high error rate. The sequences of these millionfold artificially generated nucleic acids were determined, subsequently subdivided mathematically into even much shorter sequences, and these were arbitrarily combined with each other. From the multitude of these arbitrary combination products, special software programs are used to select those that match a nucleic acid once it has been specified. The resulting mathematical construct is output as the genetic strand of a virus.” (http://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/the-end-of-corona-a-chance-for-everybody.pdf)
So basically what Lanka claims is that the raw reads that are produced by the sequencing hardware correspond to real genetic sequences which exist in physical reality, but he claims that the source of the sequences are contaminants and not viruses. And he claims that when the raw reads are assembled to form a whole-genome sequence, it ends up reproducing the alleged genome of SARS 2 because during the alignment step of the assembly process, the reference genome of SARS 2 is employed as a template against which the raw reads are aligned.
However you can look up the raw reads for a SARS 2 sequencing run yourself. For example go to the “Data availability” section at the end of this paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409862/. Click on “SRR12109250” under “Data availability”, click on “SRR12109250” again, click on “Reads”, and copy the nucleotide sequence of the first raw read:
gttgtacttc gttcagttac gtattgctaa ggttaagact actctgcctt tgaacagcac cttcatcaga ttcagcttgc atggcattgt tagtagcctt atttaaggct cacctcagct tacctcctca tgtttaaggt aaacgatggc tgcattaacc actgttggtt ttaccttttt agcttcttcc acaatgtctg catttttaat gtatgcattg tcattagttt taataaccac cactaaaact attcacttta atgaat. Then paste the sequence to the “Enter Query Sequence” field in nucleotide BLAST. (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PROGRAM=blastn) Then when you click the “BLAST” button, you’ll see that the best match for the sequence is a genome of SARS 2, with around 90.24% identity which is within the typical error rate for nanopore sequencing. So if the sequence of the raw read actually comes from a contaminant like cow blood like Lanka claims, then why is the genome of the contaminant not the top match for the raw read? The GenBank database is full of the genetic sequences of contaminants. And if the genome of SARS 2 is just made up like Lanka claims, then why can you find a 266-nucleotide sequence in nature which is around 90% identical to a segment of the genome of SARS 2?Lanka makes it seem like the process of assembling the raw reads involves some kind of black magic, but actually the assembly pipeline employs the same command line utilities that are used to assemble the genomes of humans and other organisms. One assembly pipeline that was designed for SARS 2 is called HaVoC, and it uses BWA or Bowtie to align the raw reads, Sambamba or Samtools to process SAM and BAM files, BEDtools to mask low coverage regions, Lofreq to do variant calling, and BCFtools or Samtools to perform concensus calling. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8285700/) The same programs like BWA and Samtools are also used to assemble human genomes. (https://wikis.utexas.edu/display/CoreNGSTools/The+Basic+Alignment+Workflow)
You can also try to assemble the raw reads yourself. Go to the “Data availability” section at the end of this paper: https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409862/. Click on “SRR12109250” under “Data availability”, click on “SRR12109250” again, click on “FASTA/FASTQ Download”. Then open this online utility for assembling the raw reads: https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/ncov/online/tool/variation?lang=en. Press the “Choose File” button next to “Upload Single-end Sequencing file”, select the file you just downloaded, and press the “Run” button. Then after a few minutes you’ll get the assembled genome, and it also shows you all of the bases where the assembled genome differs from the reference genome. The default reference genome used by the online utility is Wuhan-Hu-1, which is supposed to have been collected in December 2019. But yet the online utility detects that the raw reads you uploaded have the D614G mutation at position 23403, which only became common in March 2020. (https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310631/)
So if the D614G mutation is not part of the Wuhan-Hu-1 reference genome, then where does the information about the mutation come from? Is the sequencing hardware rigged (so that the mutation is already present in the FASTQ file) or is the assembly software rigged (so that the mutation is not present in the FASTQ file)?
If the sequencing hardware is rigged, then does the hardware look up information from some online database so that for example it should begin to introduce the D614G mutation to the raw reads around March 2020, and then later it should keep introducing the D614G mutation less often in Asia but more often in Europe? Would different sequencers by different manufacturers all be rigged the same way, and would even old sequencers which were manufactured before COVID be rigged? Would the sequencers also have similarly rigged logic for thousands or millions of other species of viruses so that for each virus, the sequencer somehow knows how to introduce the mutations which are supposed to currently be common at the current part of the world? How would the sequencer even know that a raw read is supposed to represent a part of the genome of a virus? Often the raw reads have an accuracy of only around 80% or 90%, and the sequencer would need to loop through the genomes of thousands of viruses to see if any of them matches the raw read with a high enough accuracy so that new mutations should be introduced to that region of the virus. But often there’s millions of raw reads per run, so it would take forever to check each of them against each species of virus.
Or alternatively, is the rigging done on the level of the command line programs that are used to do assemble the raw reads into a complete genome? Do the command line utilities look up information from some online database so that they know which mutations they should introduce to the virus depending on which mutations are supposed to be common at the current time in the current geographic area? You can see that’s not the case if you look up the source code of the utilities. (https://github.com/lh3/bwa, https://github.com/samtools) And the utilities don’t even require an internet connection to run.
If you think that my method of doing a BLAST search for a raw read is not valid in the case of viruses, then you can also try my method with some other organism. For example when I searched the NCBI’s nucleotide read archive for “oxford nanopore wgs dog”, I found a set of raw reads titled “WGS of Canis lupus familiaris: male yellow Labrador retriever”. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX8367779%5baccn%5d) The set of raw reads was sequenced using the GridION sequencer by Oxford Nanopore Technologies which is also commonly used to sequence genomes of SARS 2. Then I clicked on “SRR11816795”, I clicked on “Reads”, I copied the sequence of the first read, I googled for “nucleotide BLAST” and opened the first result, I pasted the sequence into the big text field at the top, and I pressed the “BLAST” button. Then the best match for the BLAST search ended up being a sequence titled “Canis lupus familiaris breed Labrador retriever chromosome 37a”. So if the raw reads produced by the GridION sequencer are valid in the case of Labrador retrievers, then why are they not valid in the case of SARS 2?
On NextStrain, you can see how different mutations have been introduced to the genome of SARS 2 over time, and how different mutations are common in different parts of the world. (https://nextstrain.org/ncov) However the mutations are not part of the Wuhan-Hu-1 reference genome which is typically used to align the raw reads, so where does the information about the mutations come from?
In an interview with Tom Cowan in 2022, Christine Massey said: “And then, thank God someone sent me that first presentation that Dr. Kaufman did, where he was talking about the testing, and he mentioned that the alleged virus hadn’t been isolated. So that was so helpful. And then he did the second one, where he talked about Koch’s postulates. So that was what actually inspired me to start sending out these Freedom of Information requests. And because Dr. Kaufman did that nice little section where he said, okay, if viruses existed, this is how they could isolate them, but this is what they actually do in these studies. So I watched it and watched it and watched it.” (https://drtomcowan.com/blogs/podcasts/conversations-with-dr-cowan-friends-ep-44-christine-massey, time 12:36)
However Andrew Kaufman’s first presentation was livestreamed on the YouTube channel of the flat earther James True, who said on Twitter that he was Kaufman’s “lead writer”, that he had hired a video editor and a producer to make Kaufman’s videos, and that he had emptied his Patreon account on “editors, publishing, and pushing Dr Kaufman’s video”. True said that he first met Kaufman on a retreat of the Omega Institute for Holistic Studies where he also met with the flat earther Amandha Vollmer. James True has also tweeted about how great Lucifer is, about how he believes in telling lies to people in order to bring forth Lucifer, and about how the lies he has been telling to his followers are a gift to teach them discernment, and his tweets are full of Masonic concepts like Great Work and the Phoenix rising from the ashes. The PowerPoint file of Kaufman’s debut presentation was hosted on James True’s website, so True may have written the PowerPoint slides, and I think True may have also written the script of Kaufman’s film Hippocratic Hypocrisy which was produced and narrated by the flat earth channel Spacebusters, because the film featured extended discussion about the occult meaning of the Staff of Asclepius and the Caduceus of Hermes which was also the topic of one of True’s YouTube videos. Kaufman did his debut interview in November 2019 with James True, and I think the next three people who interviewed Kaufman were the flat earthers Crrow777, Jason Lindgren, and Richie from Boston. Crrow777’s name probably comes from Aleister Crowley’s Kabbalistic text “777”, and Crrow777 said that he has “talked to so many people that I was in the Marine Corps with that were masons”. And James True is also ex-military. (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1zdsOm3LvgBv5OdSVnxSdpAou6mv7WMrA)
This is good. However I’m thinking that most people don’t understand why one needs to isolate a virus. It’s a lack of ability to think.We are hooped.